Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pilot trial evaluates CGM-based coaching for glycemic and emotional management in type 1 diabetes, suggesting potential as an alternative treatment.
In the Korean Type 1 Diabetes Home Care Pilot Project, patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) receive at least two monthly remote educational consultations from a multidisciplinary team. This randomized trial evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of individualized, semi-automated coaching messages based on continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data for glycemic and emotional management in patients with T1D as a potential alternative to current treatments. Participants who had already enrolled in the national home care program for T1D were randomized in a 1:2 ratio to the control or intervention groups. The control group continued their current treatment, while the intervention group received weekly CGM-based coaching messages for glycemic management and biweekly emotional support messages based on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for six weeks. Feasibility was assessed based on the difference in time in range (TIR; 70–180 mg/dL) at week 6, other CGM metrics, and patient-reported outcomes. Eighteen participants were enrolled. At week 6, the median TIR was 72.6% (interquartile range [IQR], 46.8–77.0) in the control group (n = 6) and 79.0% (IQR, 65.0–82.1) in the intervention group (n = 12), with no significant difference (p = 0.33). The intervention group showed a significantly lower median PHQ-9 score (2.5) in week 6 compared to the control group (6.0) (p = 0.03). The use of individualized semi-automated coaching messages was feasible and acceptable for glycemic and emotional management in individuals with T1D. Further large-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings and assess their long-term clinical impact. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06525454).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: