Develops a risk scoring system predicting ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women undergoing IVF/ICSI, suggesting improved prevention strategies.
To develop a practical, pre-trigger risk scoring system using routinely available clinical parameters to predict moderate-to-severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles. We retrospectively analyzed women undergoing their first fresh IVF/ICSI cycle between January 2018 and July 2025. Only pre-trigger variables were included. Univariable logistic regression identified candidate predictors, which were entered into multivariable logistic regression with backward selection. Regression coefficients were converted into an integer-based risk score. Model performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, calibration, and internal bootstrap validation. A total of 1,641 women were included, of whom 125 (7.6%) developed moderate-to-severe OHSS. Younger age, higher AMH, lower FSH and E2, elevated LH/FSH ratio, and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) were independently associated with OHSS. These six predictors were incorporated into a 0–13 point scoring system. OHSS incidence increased progressively with higher scores, enabling clinically meaningful stratification into low-, moderate-, high-, and very high-risk categories. The model demonstrated good discrimination (AUC 0.84; 95% CI 0.81–0.87) and excellent calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow p = 0.61). Bootstrap validation confirmed robust performance with minimal optimism. The score retained predictive utility in both PCOS and non-PCOS subgroups. We developed a simple, pre-trigger risk scoring system that reliably predicts moderate-to-severe OHSS prior to final oocyte maturation, supporting proactive prevention and individualized stimulation strategies. External and prospective multicenter validation is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: