This model examines how tax progressivity affects growth and distribution in an economy, suggesting tailored policies for effective outcomes.
We develop a neo‐Kaleckian growth‐and‐distribution model featuring two classes of workers and a progressive income tax. Two fiscal closures are considered: balanced budgets and deficit financing via public debt. We study the responses to shocks, including changes in functional income distribution, and assess how tax progressivity alters demand and accumulation regimes. Outcomes hinge on the interaction between class‐specific saving‐rate differentials and tax progressivity. Hence, redistribution and tax‐reform policies should be designed to match the economy's context and underlying saving behavior, rather than following a one‐size‐fits‐all rule.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ventura et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: