PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026Agronomy Journal1 citations

Sustainable rice farming: The benefits of substituting fertilizer‐N with milk vetch for improved soil structure and quality

View Full Paper
HYHaoliang YuanHunan Academy of Agricultural SciencesJZJing ZhangSouth China Agricultural UniversityYLYulin LiaoHunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences

Key Points

  • To assess the impact of milk vetch substitution for nitrogen fertilizer on soil structure and rice yield.
  • Conducted a 10-year field experiment
  • Evaluated various nitrogen and milk vetch combinations
  • Measured soil aggregate stability, nutrient retention, and fertility
  • N 80 G 20 and N 60 G 40 treatments enhanced soil aggregate stability by up to 12.1%
  • N 60 G 40 treatment increased carbon pool management index by 45.0%
  • Both treatments elevated total nitrogen and phosphorus in larger soil aggregates
  • N 60 G 40 treatment improved soil quality index by 34.1%

Abstract

Abstract As a legume green manure, Chinese milk vetch (MV; Astragalus sinicus L.) has been widely used to reduce nitrogen (N) fertilizer use. However, its effects on soil aggregate stability, nutrient retention, and contribution to soil fertility remain unclear. A 10‐year field experiment evaluated different MV substitution rates to identify the optimal balance between soil fertility and rice yield. The treatments included no fertilizer (CK), 100% chemical fertilizer (N 100 ), and recommended mineral N supply with different proportions of green manure (N 80 G 20 , N 60 G 40 , N 40 G 60 , and N 20 G 80 ). Compared with the N 100 treatment, the N 80 G 20 and N 60 G 40 treatments increased the mean weight diameter and geometric mean diameter of the soil by 4.2%–5.3% and 7.7%–12.1%. The N 60 G 40 treatment significantly increased the carbon pool management index by 45.0%. The N 80 G 20 and N 60 G 40 treatments increased total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) in macro‐aggregates (>0.25 mm) and improved the contribution rates of TN and TP in >2 mm aggregates. Compared with the N 100 treatment, the N 60 G 40 treatment improved TN, TP and total potassium by 6.0%, 9.3%, and 5.6%, respectively. The N 60 G 40 treatment improved the soil quality index most by 34.1%, which was positively correlated with grain yield. Substituting 20%–60% of mineral N with MV can sustain the grain yield, while higher substitution rates reduced it, especially in early rice. Consequently, incorporating MV to substitute 20%–40% N fertilizer enhanced soil structure by increasing the proportion of macro‐aggregates, thereby improving nutrient retention and soil fertility, which offers a sustainable practice for double‐rice systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yuan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af950a70916d39fea4c256https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70267
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper