Abstract Purpose Chinese milk vetch (MV) is widely used in rice yield enhancement because of the huge nitrogen (N) substitution potential. However, the proper substitution rate of MV for N fertilizer and its effect on carbon sequestration and nutrient retention in soil aggregates remains unknown. Method A 10-year field experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of different MV substitution rates on soil aggregate stability, nutrient retention, and soil quality in a double rice cropping system. The treatments included no fertilizer (CK), 100% NPK fertilizer (N₁₀₀), recommended N supply by different proportions of MV (N₈₀G₂₀, N₆₀G₄₀, N₄₀G₆₀, N₂₀G₈₀) Result Compared with the N₁₀₀ treatment, the N₈₀G₂₀ and the N₆₀G₄₀ treatment increased the mean weight diameter (MWD) by 4.2% and 5.3%, and the geometric mean diameter (GMD) by 7.7% and 12.1%, respectively. The N₆₀G₄₀ treatment significantly increased the labile organic carbon content and carbon pool management index by 24.7% and 45.0%, respectively. N₈₀G₂₀ and N₆₀G₄₀ treatments directly increased total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) in macro-aggregates (> 0.25mm), and improved the contribution of total nutrients in > 2mm aggregate. Compared with the N₁₀₀ treatment, the N₆₀G₄₀ treatment improved TN, TP and TK by 6.0%, 9.3% and 5.6%. Incorporating MV improved the soil quality index (SQI), with N₆₀G₄₀ treatment improved the most by 34.1%. And the grain yield increased significantly with the increasing SQI. Substituting 20–60% of N by MV can sustain grain yield. However, a higher substitution rate significantly reduced grain yield, particularly in the early rice. Conclusions Consequently, Incorporating MV to substitute 20–40% N fertilizer can enhance soil structure by improving the proportion of macro-aggregates, thereby improving nutrient retention and soil quality. This study provides a sustainable and eco-friendly approach in the double rice cropping systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuan et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: