This framework predicts multi-horizon corporate default risk, enhancing transparency and decision-making.
Accurate and transparent default prediction is central to credit‐risk operations and policy. This paper proposes ELG, an interpretable two‐stage machine‐learning framework for decision support in corporate default prediction. Stage I uses an explainable, sparsity‐controlled selector (E‐LassoNet) to produce a compact, auditable feature set; Stage II fits a gradient‐boosting model (GBDT) on the retained drivers to capture residual nonlinearity and output multi‐horizon default probabilities. Using a large firm‐year panel of Chinese listed companies and evaluating six forecast horizons, ELG achieves AUCs in the 0.98–0.99 range and Recalls in the 0.94–0.99 range with 27–28 predictors and outperforms standard classifiers on AUC and G_mean at most horizons. Post‐analysis shows financial signals dominate short horizons, while governance and other non‐financial indicators grow in importance at longer horizons. By enforcing interpretability ex ante and evaluating with decision‐aligned metrics, ELG links transparent feature selection to actionable, horizon‐aware forecasts, improving deployability and governance for credit‐risk management in emerging markets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: