PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026Greenhouse Gases Science and Technology2 citationsOpen Access

Dry Reforming of Biogas Over Li–Ni–Al Catalysts: Influence of Li Incorporation Method

View Full Paper
CSCristine Munari SteffensOPOscar W. Perez‐Lopez

Key Points

  • The aim is to investigate the impact of different lithium incorporation methods on the performance of Ni–Al catalysts for dry reforming of biogas.
  • Modification of Ni–Al catalysts derived from hydrotalcite with lithium via various methods.
  • Assessment of catalytic activity using synthetic biogas (60% CH4, 40% CO2).
  • Characterization techniques included N2 adsorption-desorption, XRD, TPR, CO2-TPD, SEM, and TPO.
  • Testing conducted at temperatures ranging from 500 to 750°C, with stability tests at 700°C for 8 hours.
  • The coprecipitation method yielded the highest CH4 conversion rate of 54% after 480 minutes.
  • The coprecipitated catalyst showed superior structural properties, featuring smaller crystallite size and higher basicity.
  • Impregnated samples exhibited poor performance due to formation of LiAlO2 phase, leading to low surface area.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Hydrogen is a promising source of energy, given the current context of depletion of fossil fuels and increased emissions of greenhouse gases. The technological route for obtaining this fuel from the dry reforming of biogas has received considerable attention from researchers, as it converts the polluting gases CH 4 and CO 2 into synthesis gas (H 2 and CO). In this work, Ni–Al catalysts derived from hydrotalcite were modified with lithium through different methods and were tested in the biogas dry reforming. Coprecipitation, wet and dry impregnation methods were applied, as well as memory effect reconstruction. N 2 adsorption–desorption, XRD, TPR, CO 2 ‐TPD, SEM, and TPO techniques were used for the characterization of the catalysts. For the catalytic tests, a flow rate of 60% CH 4 and 40% CO 2 was used as synthetic biogas. The ramp tests were carried out in the range from 500 to 750°C while the stability tests were carried out at 700°C for 8 h. The results demonstrated that the different Li incorporation methods had a strong effect on the surface, structural and reduction properties of the obtained catalysts. The coprecipitated sample (CP) presented the best performance in the reaction, due to its smaller crystallite size, high basicity and presence of weak, medium and strong basic sites, while the worst results observed for the impregnated samples were attributed to the formation of the LiAlO 2 phase in these samples, resulting in materials with low surface area and large crystallite size. The CP sample reached the highest CH 4 conversion (54%) after 480 min of reaction and a low carbon formation rate.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Steffens et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af951a70916d39fea4c544https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.70016
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper