Formal test examines buffer-stock saving in the US, suggesting empirical support for the hypothesis.
There is an ongoing debate about the buffer‐stock saving hypothesis. This paper develops a formal test of the hypothesis by examining the sub‐unity of the marginal propensity to consume out of permanent income (MPCP). Our test relies on a novel estimator of the average derivative of a nonparametric consumption model, using constructed measures of latent permanent income shocks that accommodate nonparametric income distributions. Following Li and Vuong (1998), we use a Kotlarski‐based approach to account for asymmetric errors, which is crucial for testing buffer‐stock behavior. Applied to the US Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) data, our test rejects a unit MPCP, providing empirical support for buffer‐stock saving.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: