This philosophical analysis models the city, exploring urban theory implications and the importance of modeling choices.
Questions in the philosophy of the city are often approached first by modeling the city. I explain what models are and work through some examples to offer a rational reconstruction of how they are used by urban theorists and philosophers. Of special note is the influence modeling choices have on our conclusions about the city, rendering disputes about models especially tricky. I conclude with a critical discussion of some philosophical lessons about the city gleaned from the survey of models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jake Monaghan (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: