This essay argues for reexamining the migration-development relationship, suggesting broader perspectives on mobility.
This essay argues that our understanding of the relationship between development and migration is distorted by a focus on areas of greatest policy concern. It calls for more research into broader processes of mobility, which may be of little interest to policy but play a critical role in the lives of poor people. It develops the argument in three points. First, in the last 20 years there has been a marked shift from interest in how migration may contribute to development towards a concern with how development may help deal with the challenges of migration. Second, this discussion assumes that only orderly, safe, regular and responsible migration can make a positive contribution to development, rendering important forms of mobility as problematic and antithetical to development. Third, the analysis of migration and mobility remains too much of a niche subject within development studies, being mainly the domain of migration scholars exploring the ‘migration‐development nexus’. As a result, there is still limited understanding of the complex interlinkages between migration—especially the important but often unseen migration—and development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oliver Bakewell (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: