Systematic review reports on effective interventions to improve skills in youth, indicating potential for reduced aggression.
Disruptive behavior in youth (i.e., persistent oppositional, aggressive, or delinquent conduct) predicts harm to self and others, as well as long-term social exclusion. Tertiary, skill-oriented programs aim to prevent the escalation of these behaviors and strengthen personal and social skills. However, an up-to-date, comprehensive synthesis of their effectiveness is still lacking. In accordance with PRISMA 2020, we searched Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest, and B-on. Studies included justice-involved, school-referred, community, and/or mixed-setting. Overall, 43 peer-reviewed studies (January 2013–May 2025) evaluating tertiary, skill-focused interventions for youth aged 10–24 met the eligibility criteria. Outcomes primarily indexed reductions in disruptive behavior (e.g., aggression, violent behavior) and/or improvements in skills (e.g., emotion regulation, self-control, empathy, problem solving). Theme-focused, multimodal, and sufficiently intensive programs were most consistently associated with reduced aggression and improved skills. However, findings and methodological quality were heterogeneous, and follow-up data was limited. Digital delivery components were rare. We discuss these findings and propose a modular program architecture that combines a structured, evidence-based core (e.g., manualized content, fidelity monitoring) with planned flexibility (e.g., thematic breadth, dosage) to match youths’ risk-need profiles and the constraints of justice, school, and community settings. Key limitations (e.g., limited follow-up, cultural sensitivity) and future directions (e.g., finer-grained analyses linking youngsters’ needs to specific modules) are also discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soares et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: