Shows citric acid hydrolysis improves microcrystalline cellulose properties in waste paper pulp, suggesting an eco-friendly production method.
Microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) was isolated from waste paper pulp using an eco-friendly approach based on citric acid hydrolysis, offering a green alternative to conventional mineral acids. This study investigated the influence of citric acid concentration (3 M, 4 M, and 5 M) on the resulting MCC's properties, followed by purification and bleaching. The optimal condition was achieved with 4 M citric acid (MCC4), which produced MCC with a high crystallinity index (80.2%), a substantial yield (78.1%), and excellent thermal stability (T peak = 350.5 °C). The isolated rod-shaped MCC from paper pulp showed the particle dimension in the average of 14.98 μm with a narrow distribution. A comprehensive physicochemical analysis demonstrated that the properties of the resulting MCC (including density, pH, and ash content) were highly comparable to commercial Avicel PH-101. Notably, the prepared MCC4 exhibited superior functional properties, specifically higher water holding capacity (2.95 g/g) and oil holding capacity (3.05 g/g). The findings demonstrate that citric acid hydrolysis is a highly effective, non-corrosive, and environmentally friendly alternative to traditional mineral acid methods for MCC production. This research provides a viable pathway for transforming paper waste into high-value bioproducts suitable for pharmaceutical, food, and composite applications, contributing to a circular bio-economy. • An eco-friendly citric acid hydrolysis method was applied to waste paper pulp. • 4 M citric acid concentration optimized the yield (78.1%) and crystallinity (80.2%). • The produced MCC exhibited excellent thermal stability (T peak = 350.5 °C). • Physicochemical properties of the resulting MCC were comparable to Avicel PH-101. • Water (WHC) and oil (OHC) holding capacities were superior to the commercial standard.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holilah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: