Demonstrates that multiple non-native species enhance growth and reproduction in yellow catfish, suggesting management beyond single-species intervention.
The successful establishment of non-native fish often relies on life-history plasticity and opportunistic trophic strategies. This study elucidates the invasion mechanisms of the non-native yellow catfish (Pelteobagrus fulvidraco) in Lake Erhai, a plateau lake in China, by integrating morphometrics, stable isotope analysis, and DNA metabarcoding. Our results reveal a “triple mechanism” driving this invasion success. First, the population exhibits significant phenotypic plasticity, manifesting as enhanced somatic growth and superior body condition (mean condition factor: 1.92) and sexually dimorphic growth favoring males. Second, DNA metabarcoding confirms a broad trophic niche dominated by zooplankton (31.70%) and, critically, other non-native fishes (Hypomesus nipponensis and Neosalanx taihuensis), providing strong empirical support for the synergistic effects of multiple non-native species. This predation on high-energy forage fish likely fuels the observed somatic growth and high reproductive output, counteracting the typical size-reduction trade-offs often seen in biological invasions. Third, reproductive assessment indicates a protracted spawning period (spanning at least from spring through summer) and an absolute fecundity (mean: 8471 ± 2194 eggs) consistent with its strategy of producing larger, high-quality eggs, significantly exceeding that of native riverine populations. These findings suggest that P. fulvidraco effectively exploits altered food webs—specifically pre-existing invasive prey—to maximize somatic growth and reproductive output, thereby establishing dominance in the plateau lake ecosystem. Therefore, effective management strategies must go beyond single-species control and prioritize controlling pre-existing invasive forage fish to disrupt the facilitation pathway driven by ecosystem alteration by invasive species.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: