⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

January 1, 2025The Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological AssociationOpen Access

Proportion congruency effects in a Stroop task

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

The aim is to understand how different levels of congruency influence performance in a Stroop task.
Utilized a Stroop task to assess cognitive interference.
Examined varying proportions of congruent and incongruent stimuli.
Analyzed performance metrics to gauge processing efficiency.
Increased proportion congruency led to improved task performance.
Performance varied significantly with congruency level.
Observed cognitive interference effects based on stimulus types.

No abstract yet

We only have this paper's title and publication details.

Read it at the source→

Implication

Explores how congruency affects task performance in a Stroop task, suggesting insights into cognitive processing.

Abstract

Proportion congruency effects in a Stroop taskA study of deviant processing

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Kota Suzuki (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b2573196eeacc4fcec5d56 https://doi.org/10.4992/pacjpa.89.0_749

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1The Stroop effect: Why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency.Original Research · 2008 · 297 citations
2No pupillometric evidence for effortful proactive control in the proportion-congruent Stroop paradigm2024
3Proactive and reactive cognitive control in the absence of learning and memory confounds: Evidence from a cross-modal trial-unique Stroop task.2024 · 1 citations
4Proactive control adaptation in Stroop tasks reflects adjustments in the strength of distractor suppression2024
5Proactive control adaptation in stroop tasks reflects adjustments in the strength of distractor suppression.2025 · 5 citations

The primed Stroop is not a Stroop task: Evidence from delta plots2026
Three variables, one effect : what happens to the Stroop effect when the internal validity of the "Stroop protocol" tool is re-established?2024
Trial-by-trial modulations of the spatial congruency effect of gaze and arrows: A distribution analysis2024
Effects of Task Performance Feedback on Heart Rate Variability and Emotional Responses after Task CompletionThe Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association · 2025
Habitual Violent Game Exposure and Heart Rate VariabilityThe Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association · 2025

TMore from The Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association

More from Shitennoji University