Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective protocol reveals effects of auditory stimulation on delta waves during anesthesia, suggesting new neuromodulation strategies.
Introduction Delta waves (0.1–4 Hz) are a hallmark of unconsciousness in both sleep and general anesthesia (GA). Closed-loop auditory stimulation (CLAS) delivers brief sounds phase-locked to ongoing slow oscillations and can modulate slow-wave activity (SWA) during sleep, but its efficacy and translational relevance under propofol anesthesia, particularly in the presence of nociceptive input, remain unknown. Methods We describe a prospective, within-subject protocol in 30 neurologically healthy adults undergoing elective surgery under propofol GA. Intraoperative high-density electroencephalography (hd-EEG; 128 channels) is recorded while a real-time CLAS algorithm detects δ -waves at the Fz electrode, and triggers pink-noise bursts in three conditions: in-phase (peak-locked), anti-phase (trough-locked), and sham . An extended in-phase block is then combined with a standardized tetanic nociceptive stimulus (100 Hz, 70 mA, 30 s) to test robustness under an arousal challenge. Depth of hypnosis is monitored with the Bispectral Index (BIS), and nociceptive/autonomic reactivity with the Nociception Level (NOL) index. Primary outcomes quantify δ -wave morphology and SWA (amplitude, slopes, duration/frequency, transition frequency, density, power spectral density), along with topography, source estimation, and propagation. Secondary outcomes include depth of anesthesia (BIS), nociceptive balance (NOL), functional connectivity (weighted and directed phase-lag indices), graph-theoretical organization (global efficiency, clustering, modularity, small-worldness), and EEG microstates (duration, coverage, transitions). Anticipated results We hypothesize that in-phase CLAS will increase amplitude, slope, duration, and density of δ -waves, and decrease frequency and transition frequency relative to sham , whereas anti-phase CLAS will cause a disruption these parameters relative to sham . Under nociception, in-phase CLAS is expected to these parameters preserve δ -wave integrity, with effects attenuated relative to non-nociceptive conditions. We anticipate BIS values to remain within the surgical range but trend lower during in-phase CLAS, alongside reduced nociceptive/autonomic responses. At the network level, we expect CLAS-induced δ -wave reinforcement to be associated with more locally coherent δ-band activity and reduced frontoparietal integration, consistent with deeper unconsciousness. Discussion If confirmed, these findings would position CLAS as a candidate neuromodulation strategy to reinforce anesthetic δ -wave dynamics and help stabilize anesthesia without necessarily increasing pharmacological dose, while also providing a systems-level test of the role of slow oscillations in sustaining unconsciousness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roca et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: