Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Thermodynamic modelling demonstrates lithium enrichment via biotite melting, suggesting key petrogenetic insights.
Granitic melts derived from anatexis of metasedimentary rocks, particularly biotite-dehydration reactions, are important lithium (Li) sources. Petrogenetic models depend on mineral-melt lithium partitioning, yet published partition coefficients ( D_Li^mineral/melt D Li mineral/melt ) vary by over an order of magnitude, and are commonly used as static values. Here we use thermodynamic modelling coupled with relevant published D_Li^mineral/melt D Li mineral/melt ranges, including a dynamic composition- and temperature-dependent D_Li^biotite/melt D Li biotite/melt , to quantify viable enrichment during partial melting and fractional crystallisation. Using the lithium-rich Cornubian granite batholith, we demonstrate the sensitivity of results to D_Li^mineral/melt D Li mineral/melt choices for modally-dominant lithium-poor phases (e.g. quartz), as well as phases traditionally thought to dominate lithium budgets (e.g. biotite). While economic lithium enrichment can result from extreme fractionation with selective D_Li^mineral/melt D Li mineral/melt , we suggest that dehydration melting of fluorinated biotite is the most viable petrogenetic model. The latter reconciles the common observations of fluorite in lithium-granites and their late-orogenic occurrence, and provides a mechanism for extensive fractionation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morris et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: