Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis reveals drug survival trends and discontinuation reasons for bDMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis patients, suggesting tailored treatment is essential.
Background: Continuity of care for rheumatoid arthritis patients within regional networks enables stable long-term clinical data collection, despite chronic rheumatologist shortages in Japan. We determined 5-year drug survival and discontinuation reasons for eight biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) using a regional multicenter registry. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 1182 patients initiating their first (naïve, n = 784) or subsequent (switch, n = 398) bDMARD between May 2001 and August 2022 across five institutions. The primary endpoint (5-year drug survival) and secondary endpoints (discontinuation risk factors and cumulative incidence of reasons) were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier curves, Cox proportional hazards, and Fine & Gray models. Results: Baseline characteristics varied significantly among bDMARDs. Five-year drug survival in the naïve cohort ranged from tocilizumab (50.8%) to golimumab (22.6%); in the switch cohort, from abatacept (42.6%) to infliximab (10.0%). In multivariable Cox analysis of naïve patients, male sex (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09–2.02), lower baseline 28-joint Disease Activity Score with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) (HR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.82–0.99), and absence of methotrexate co-therapy (HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.55–0.97) predicted discontinuation. The lower baseline DAS28-ESR association potentially reflects successful courses toward intentional cessation following remission. Discontinuations were attributed to inadequate response (27.1%), non-adverse events (25.3%), and adverse events (17.3%). Conclusions: Tocilizumab and abatacept demonstrated the highest retention rates in biologic-naïve and switch cohorts, respectively. Early, individualized drug selection and dose optimization are crucial to maximizing long-term bDMARD effectiveness before switching.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: