Model shows improved cost allocation and emission reductions in integrated energy systems, suggesting enhanced economic viability.
To address the issues of carbon trading cost allocation and emission reduction incentives in integrated energy system, a low-carbon economic dispatch strategy considering multi-agent green certificate-carbon trading bidirectional interaction and cost allocation is proposed. First, by introducing green certificate trading and a tiered carbon emission trading mechanism, a bidirectional interaction model for green certificates and carbon quotas is constructed, and the low-carbon value of electricity-heat-hydrogen hybrid energy storage is quantified. Second, a multi-agent carbon trading cost allocation model is designed, and a leader-follower game model is established with energy marketer as the leader and energy supplier and load aggregator as followers. Dynamic time-of-use carbon pricing is used to guide the optimization of equipment output and energy consumption strategies. On this basis, a triple incentive strategy based on electricity price incentives, green certificate revenue, and carbon trading compensation is proposed to enhance the economic feasibility of electricity-heat-hydrogen hybrid energy storage. Additionally, a lifespan degradation model is established to more accurately evaluate its long-term operational costs.Research findings indicate that adopting a dual-interaction mechanism combining green certificates and tiered carbon trading reduced the comprehensive operating costs of IES by 1.72% and lowered carbon emissions by 0.53%. The triple incentive strategy increased the operational revenue of the electricity-heat-hydrogen hybrid energy storage system by 76.16%, while improving the utilization rates of wind and solar power generation by 1.26% and 2.6%, respectively. The multi-party carbon trading cost-sharing mechanism boosted the system's overall total revenue by 3.71%, reduced total costs by 11.97%, lowered carbon trading costs by 21.06%, and decreased total carbon emissions by 19%. • A novel GCT–CET bidirectional mechanism quantifies the low-carbon value of electricity-heat-hydrogen hybrid energy storage. • Master–slave game with dynamic TOU carbon pricing guides energy dispatch and allocates multi-agent carbon trading costs. • Electricity price, GCT, and CET incentives drive hybrid storage to improve renewable integration and peak-valley regulation. • The strategy cuts system carbon emissions by 19% and lowers operational costs by 11.97% versus conventional methods. • A lifetime degradation model for electrolyzers and batteries enables more accurate long-term system cost assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: