Open-book architectures improve drug side effect identification in language models, indicating enhanced querying reliability.
Drug side effects are a major public health concern, yet off-the-shelf large language models (LLMs) struggle to reliably answer questions about drug side effects due to limited training data and domain gaps. Here, we evaluate two open-book architectures that inject curated knowledge from the Side Effect Resource (SIDER 4.1) into LLM workflows: a text-based retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipeline and a graph-based variant (GraphRAG) implemented over a Neo4j knowledge graph. On a balanced forward benchmark of 19,520 drug–side-effect pairs, GraphRAG achieved near-perfect accuracy (99.95% for Qwen-2.5-7B-Instruct and 99.96% for Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct). On reverse queries (side effect to drug set), it returned the exact drug sets with precision, recall and F1 all equal to 100% at markedly lower latency (~ 0.09 s), compared with a text-RAG baseline (F1 99.18%, 82.63 s). We further show that a compact LLM-based normalization step can robustly correct common misspellings and variants of drug names without modifying downstream logic. Taken together, these results indicate that integrating structured side-effect knowledge with compact LLMs provides a practical path to interactive, evidence-grounded querying of catalogued drug side effect associations in larger language models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nygren et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: