Cross-sectional validation of the PSQI-2 predicts poor sleep quality in older men, suggesting its practical use in large studies.
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is widely used, but can be impractical in large studies due to its length. The two-item version (PSQI-2) is a promising alternative, with underexplored longitudinal properties in older adults. We evaluated its validity against the full PSQI in the MrOS Sleep Study cohort of older men. Cross-sectional validity (Bland-Altman, ROC curves for PSQI > 5) and longitudinal properties (ICC, change score correlation, accuracy for ΔPSQI > 3) were assessed. The PSQI-2 showed a strong cross-sectional association with the full PSQI (b = 2.167, p < 0.001), explaining 72% of its variance. For identifying poor sleep quality, the PSQI-2 demonstrated excellent accuracy (AUC = 0.89) with an optimal cutoff of ≥2 (sensitivity=77.5%, specificity=84.5%). Longitudinally, both instruments showed moderate test-retest reliability (PSQI-2 ICC = 0.579; PSQI ICC = 0.639). The correlation between their change scores was strong (r = 0.682, p < 0.001), and the PSQI-2 showed reasonable accuracy (AUC = 0.754) in detecting clinically meaningful change (Δ PSQI > 3). The PSQI-2 is a valid and reliable tool for cross-sectional screening of poor sleep quality in older men at the cutoff of ≥2. It is also responsive to directional change over time and can identify individuals with clinically significant changes in sleep.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luiz Menezes-Júnior (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: