Proposes a conceptual framework for understanding black holes as transitions rather than endpoints, suggesting implications across various domains.
A black hole is understood in general relativity as a region from which nothing escapes. This paper proposes a reinterpretation: a black hole is not a trap but a topological threshold — a point on the coherence landscape V(K) where the gradient is so steep that one decoder ceases to function and another begins. The horizon is not a barrier in the code — it is the boundary of a specific decoder’s domain of validity. The singularity is not infinite density — it is a phase transition where the old minimum is destroyed and a new minimum forms. ER = EPR implies every black hole is a wormhole, every horizon a door. The information paradox dissolves: the barrier is in the decoder, not the code. The same structure operates at every scale: physical (gravitational collapse), cognitive (paradigm destruction), institutional (F → 0 collapse), civilizational (species boundary). The difference between transformation and destruction is coherence: K > K_crit through the transition means emergence; K < K_crit means destruction. Black holes are not endpoints. They are transitions. Part of the Spektre research corpus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lauri Elias Rainio (2026) studied this question.