PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 12, 2026Scientific Reports9 citationsOpen Access

Anomaly-based intrusion detection on benchmark datasets for network security: a comprehensive evaluation

LKL. K. Suresh KumarSNSrihith Reddy NethiRURavi Uyyala

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of deep learning models in detecting network intrusions using benchmark datasets.
  • Utilized two deep learning models: Deep Neural Network (DNN) and Recurrent Neural Network (RNN).
  • Trained and evaluated models on KDDCup99, NSL-KDD, and UNSW-NB15 datasets.
  • Explored multiple optimizers including Adam, SGD, Adamax, AdamW, and Adadelta.
  • Assessed performance using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and false positive rate.
  • Both models achieved over 99% accuracy on KDDCup99.
  • Detection rates improved with false positive rates below 1% for KDDCup99 and NSL-KDD.
  • On UNSW-NB15, false positive rates remained under 8%, indicating robustness.

Abstract

This study discusses two widely-recognized deep learning approaches for network intrusion detection: a Deep Neural Network (DNN) and a Recurrent Neural Network (RNN). Both models are trained and evaluated on three widely used benchmark datasets: KDDCup99, NSL-KDD (each with five classes), and UNSW-NB15 (ten classes). Multiple optimizers, including Adam, SGD, Adamax, AdamW, and Adadelta, are then explored, with Adam consistently providing the best performance. CrossEntropyLoss is found to be the most effective loss function for these multi-class classification tasks. Designed to automatically learn and extract relevant features from raw data, the models reduce reliance on manual feature engineering. Performance is assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and false positive rate. Experimental results show that both models achieve over 99% accuracy on KDDCup99, with improved detection rates and false positive rates below 1% for KDDCup99 and NSL-KDD. On the more complex UNSW-NB15 dataset, false positive rates also remain under 8%, demonstrating the models’ robustness and generalizability across diverse intrusion scenarios.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kumar et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b25aab96eeacc4fcec8944https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38317-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper