Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Research investigates remineralisation properties of calcium silicates and ionomer cements in dentine, indicating potential benefits for dental restorations.
Calcium silicate-based and glass ionomer cements are often used in caries-affected dentine. This study investigated the remineralising and physicochemical properties of two calcium silicates and a glass ionomer cement. Human molars with Class I cavities were subjected to pH cycling to simulate caries lesions. These were restored using two different calcium silicate cements (CTR-MTA or MTA-VOCO) or a glass ionomer cement (GIC). After storage in artificial saliva, Knoop microhardness (KHN) was measured within a 300-µm zone from the interface. Solubility, pH, calcium ion release, scanning electron microscopy (SEM)-energy-dispersive x-ray (EDX) and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analyses were also conducted. Data were statistically analysed with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Both MTAs promoted greater remineralisation (KHN) compared to GIC. GIC showed the lowest solubility, whereas CTR-MTA demonstrated the highest solubility, followed by MTA-VOCO; the latter had the highest calcium release. Apatite deposition was observed only in the MTA groups (SEM-EDX and FTIR). MTA-VOCO demonstrated superior calcium ion release and increased dentine microhardness, although some signs of collagen degradation were also visible. Clinical relevance: GIC and calcium silicate cements may enhance mineral deposition in caries-affected dentine, though the alkalinity of MTAs might compromise collagen integrity at the bonding interface.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lukomska‐Szymanska et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: