Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A national survey evaluates curriculum and teaching practices in Canadian physiotherapy education, suggesting improvements in pain management training.
Purpose: Physiotherapists play an essential role in managing pain, yet inconsistencies in pain management education across Canadian entry-level physiotherapy (PT) programmes raise concerns about student preparedness. The Pain Education in Physiotherapy (PEP) competency profile was developed as a national standard outlining 15 competencies essential for high-quality pain management. This study evaluated how PEP competencies are integrated into Canadian PT curricula, focusing on content, teaching strategies, assessment methods, and educators’ perceptions of student preparedness. Method: A cross-sectional survey was distributed to educators from all 15 Canadian PT programmes. It assessed competency integration, instructional hours, learning outcomes, teaching and assessment strategies, and perceived student preparedness. Closed-ended responses were analyzed descriptively, open-ended responses using conventional content analysis. Results: Fourteen programmes (93%) participated. While most competencies ( n = 11, 73%) were consistently included, advocacy and cultural safety were less frequently addressed. Instructional hours ranged from 1.78 to 19.75 hours per competency. Didactic teaching methods and written assessments predominated; fewer programmes employed interactive strategies, such as simulations. Fewer than 50% of programmes reported students as fully prepared for several competencies. Conclusion: Findings reflect broad integration of the PEP competencies but highlight variability in delivery, emphasizing the need to optimize teaching strategies and explore implementation challenges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Augeard et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: