PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 12, 20260 citations

Human Milk in Dry Eye Disease: A Narrative Review with Historical Translation from the Ebers Papyrus.

View Full Paper
DMDavid MaskillUniversity of LeedsRBRobert Morgan BlizzardYork District HospitalAOArthur OkonkwoLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

Key Points

  • This review aims to explore the historical use of human milk in treating dry eye disease and its relevance today.
  • Translation and interpretation of human milk-based remedies from the Ebers papyrus.
  • Evaluation of growth factors in human milk and their parallels with existing treatments.
  • Review of animal models and clinical studies on the efficacy of human milk and bovine colostrum.
  • Human milk and bovine colostrum show potential in corneal epithelial healing.
  • Both also reduce ocular surface inflammation.
  • Bovine colostrum could be a cost-effective alternative to current therapies.

Abstract

Historical medical texts occasionally preserve therapeutics of unexpected modern relevance. This hypothesis-generating review presents a new translation and interpretation of human milk-based ophthalmic remedies in the Ebers papyrus (∼1550 BC) and evaluates their potential applicability to contemporary dry eye disease. Growth factors abundant in human milk parallel those delivered by autologous serum tears, and emerging evidence, including animal models and limited clinical studies, demonstrates that both human milk and bovine colostrum can promote corneal epithelial healing and reduce ocular surface inflammation. Given the high cost of current therapies and the ethical constraints surrounding donor human milk, bovine colostrum represents a low-cost, scalable alternative warranting further investigation. This historical-biomedical synthesis illustrates how ancient medical practices may inform modern strategies for managing refractory ocular surface disease.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Maskill et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b25b6496eeacc4fceca06ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/10807683261429024
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper