Laboratory bioassays demonstrate termites differentiate chemical signals from predators and competitors, indicating complex foraging strategies.
Animals frequently rely on indirect information to make foraging decisions under uncertainty. In social insects, chemical cues from other species may convey information about both predation risk and resource availability, yet how these cues are integrated during resource selection remains poorly understood. Here, we investigate how the termite Nasutitermes corniger responds to chemical cues from predators and competitors during resource selection. Using controlled laboratory bioassays, we tested termite preferences for food resources associated with cues from a predatory ant ( Pheidole sp.) and a competing termite species. Predator cues consistently reduced resource selection, indicating avoidance driven by perceived predation risk. In contrast, resources associated with competitor cues were preferentially selected, suggesting that these cues function as informative signals rather than purely competitive deterrents. Our results demonstrate that termites discriminate between heterospecific chemical cues and integrate them to balance risk and opportunity during foraging. These findings highlight the role of chemical information in shaping resource selection decisions and contribute to a broader understanding of how social insects use indirect cues to navigate complex ecological trade‐offs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: