Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates CO2 absorption efficiency in polyamine-promoted blends, suggesting improved solubility and desorption performance.
Sterically hindered amines are used as solvents for bulk CO 2 removal by reactive absorption, because their loading capacity is high and regeneration is easy. However, these amines react more slowly with CO 2 than the conventional amines. Thus, the addition of rate promoters is beneficial. This work investigated CO 2 absorption into aqueous solutions of the hindered amine 2‐amino‐2‐hydroxymethyl‐1,3‐propanediol (AHPD) promoted with the polyamine triethylenetetramine (TETA) or tetraethylenepentamine (TEPA). Absorption kinetics was studied in a stirred cell reactor in the 308–318 K range. The reactions were investigated in the fast reaction regime. In this regime, the inequality 10 < Ha < < E i holds (here, Ha and E i denote Hatta number and enhancement factor for instantaneous reaction). At 308 K, the overall rate constant was equal to 6520 (for AHPD/TETA) and 8852 s −1 (for AHPD/TEPA). The respective values of the second‐order rate constant for the CO 2 reaction with TETA and TEPA were 11,107 and 16,014 m 3 /(kmol s). These values were higher than the rate constant for monoethanolamine (MEA). A vapour–liquid equilibrium (VLE) study for the two blends AHPD/TETA and AHPD/TEPA (2.5/0.5 M) was performed to find the equilibrium solubility of CO 2 at 308 K. The highest CO 2 loading capacity was found to be 0.68 (for AHPD/TETA) and 0.76 mol/mol (for AHPD/TEPA) at CO 2 partial pressure of 85 kPa. In comparison, aqueous AHPD (2.5 M) exhibited a highest loading of 0.54 mol/mol at 75 kPa CO 2 partial pressure, thus suggesting that polyamine addition improved CO 2 solubility. Desorption features of the chosen blends were studied at 358 K in a glass reactor and compared with MEA. The efficiency of desorption for AHPD/TETA (55%) and AHPD/TEPA blend (57%) was higher than that for MEA (40%). Thus, the chosen blends exhibited better desorption performance than the conventional amine MEA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mazroy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: