PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 12, 2026Biodiversity and Conservation2 citationsOpen Access

Assessing the impact of linear infrastructure on landscape connectivity: a worked example from South Sudan and Uganda

FFFederica FondaUniversity of TriesteFBFabrizio BullegasUniversity of TriesteFPFrancesco PetruzzellisUniversity of Padua

Key Points

  • This research aims to integrate structural landscape connectivity into impact assessments of new linear infrastructure projects.
  • Created macro-regional ecological networks for current and future landscape scenarios.
  • Assessed future changes in landscape connectivity due to planned infrastructure.
  • Identified linear infrastructure that threatens ecological corridors and the integrity of ecological networks.
  • Highlighted conservation areas with high biodiversity and minimal human disturbance.
  • Quantified connectivity changes between current and proposed future scenarios.
  • Provided insights for policy makers on maintaining ecological connectivity.

Abstract

Abstract Human infrastructure development is a major cause of environmental fragmentation, which threatens biodiversity globally. Fragmentation and its consequences are particularly pronounced in developing countries, where rapid economic growth and infrastructure development often have devastating impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems. Strategies to halt biodiversity loss require the protection of ecological connectivity between areas of high conservation importance, but this is often overlooked in environmental planning and infrastructure impact assessment. In this study, we provided a worked example demonstrating how structural landscape connectivity can be integrated into the impact assessment of new linear infrastructure projects in two developing countries: South Sudan and Uganda. To achieve this aim, we (i) created macro-regional ecological networks under two scenarios, i.e. the present landscape and a future scenario that also includes the planned linear infrastructure, (ii) assessed future changes in landscape connectivity due to their implementation, and (iii) identified which linear infrastructure will pose the greater threat to ecological corridors and will impact the integrity of the ecological network. Specifically, we prioritized conservation areas with high biodiversity, threatened species and minimal human disturbance and identified the corridors connecting them. The impact of the planned linear infrastructure on corridors was assessed by quantifying the changes in connectivity between the two scenarios, both at the landscape level and in proximity of each linear infrastructure. The proposed approach could provide a basis for informing conservationists, policy makers and environmental planners in prioritising actions to maintain and restore ecological connectivity and promoting its inclusion in environmental planning and impact assessments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fonda et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b25be596eeacc4fceca4b0https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-026-03311-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Convention on Biological Diversity: a review of national challenges and opportunities for implementation2011 · 175 citations
  2. 2Conservation threats from roadkill in the global road network2021 · 131 citations
  3. 3Renewable energy infrastructure impacts biodiversity beyond the area it occupies2022 · 41 citations
  4. 4Poor availability of context-specific evidence hampers decision-making in conservation2020 · 149 citations
  5. 5Anthropogenic impact on habitat connectivity: A multidimensional human footprint index evaluated in a highly biodiverse landscape of Mexico2016 · 110 citations