What question did this study set out to answer?

The analysis aims to explore how democratic processes can shape technological progress, particularly in AI, challenging the current top-down approaches.

March 13, 2026IPPR Progressive Review

The Abundance Ultimatum: Why Technological Progress Needs More Democracy, Not Less

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

MDMatt DaviesEconomic Policy Institute

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

This analysis critiques the current tech landscape, calling for democratic engagement in shaping AI and regulations, suggesting vital societal implications.

Key Points

The analysis aims to explore how democratic processes can shape technological progress, particularly in AI, challenging the current top-down approaches.
Critique of UK policy trends regarding technological progress
Analysis of historical examples of public engagement with technology
Examination of current regulatory and corporate dynamics in AI
Advocates for strengthening community and worker veto power over technology deployment
Identifies the risks of unilateral technological imposition
Calls for pluralistic approaches to AI that reflect diverse societal needs

Cite This Study

Matt Davies (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3aaa802a1e69014ccb7a4 https://doi.org/10.1111/newe.70008

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

This analysis critiques the current tech landscape, calling for democratic engagement in shaping AI and regulations, suggesting vital societal implications.

The Abundance Ultimatum: Why Technological Progress Needs More Democracy, Not Less

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

The Abundance Ultimatum: Why Technological Progress Needs More Democracy, Not Less

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider