Authors argue for recognizing flexibility as essential in fieldwork design, enhancing research quality amid challenges.
In this short piece, we argue that flexibility should be recognised as a foundational component of robust and ethical fieldwork design, especially in contexts where researchers are likely to encounter unexpected challenges. Drawing on two case studies from doctoral fieldwork in Indonesia and Vietnam, we examine how unanticipated disruptions to original research plans, which included injury, logistical constraints, and harassment, prompted a re-evaluation of methodological priorities and options. We argue that these adaptations, which were borne of necessity, did not undermine academic rigour but rather enhanced the richness and contextual sensitivity of the research. By sharing our experiences, we advocate for institutional and pedagogical recognition of fieldwork flexibility as a strength, and call for better support mechanisms to help early-career researchers prepare for the complexities of fieldwork.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Turner et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: