Analysis predicts traffic deviations in Istanbul using machine learning, suggesting enhancements for management systems.
Traffic incident impact prediction remains challenging for intelligent transportation systems due to complex spatiotemporal dependencies. This study analyzes 38,430 real-world traffic incidents from Istanbul (2022–2024) to predict normalized traffic deviation ΔTraffic(%) using machine learning with rigorous temporal validation. Three models—Random Forest (RF), XGBoost, and LightGBM—were evaluated using rolling-origin cross-validation (2022 training, 2023 testing; 2022–2023 training, 2024 testing) to prevent temporal leakage, employing a strictly operational 13-feature set that excludes information unavailable at incident onset (t0). LightGBM achieved MAE = 26.81 ± 1.94% and R2 = 0.506 ± 0.042 (mean ± std across folds) with 95% bootstrap confidence intervals of [27.54%, 28.81%] for MAE on the 2024 test set, significantly outperforming historical baselines (R2 = 0.100 ± 0.054, p < 0.001, Bonferroni-corrected). Feature ablation studies revealed that temporal features contribute 65.2% of predictive power, while incident type contributes only 1.3%. Distributional robustness analysis confirms conclusions are stable across distributional treatments (log, winsorised, quantile), with feature importance rank correlations ρ = 1.000 between all treatment pairs. This work provides empirical evidence for context-aware traffic management systems and demonstrates the importance of proper temporal validation in transportation forecasting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Korkmaz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: