In-silico study identifies potential monkeypox antiviral inhibitors, suggesting new treatment pathways.
Background: Monkeypox virus (MPXV) has re-emerged as a major public health concern due to its expanding global spread. However, limited therapeutic options hinder disease control. Molecular docking offers a valuable computational approach for identifying potential antiviral candidates. Methods: This study docked several antiviral drugs, including tecovirimat, tipranavir, remdesivir, fluocinolone, molnupiravir, famciclovir, acyclovir, cidofovir, and brincidofovir, against the monkeypox poxin protein (Protein Data Bank Identification (PDB ID): 8C9K). These drugs were selected based on reported anti-orthopoxvirus activity, clinical availability, and frequent prescription. Drug-likeness screening identified promising inhibitors. Molecular docking was performed using PyRx v0.9.8 with a 25 × 25 × 25 Å grid centered on the active site (x = 28.7, y = 56.9, z = 37.3). Tecovirimat served as the reference drug. Adverse drug monitoring event (ADME) and toxicity predictions assessed topological polar surface area, lipophilicity, solubility, bioavailability, blood–brain barrier permeability, P-glycoprotein interaction, median lethal dose (LD₅₀), and toxicity class by the Swiss ADME webtool. Results: Fluocinolone (−8.8 kcal/mol; Kilocalorie per mole), remdesivir (−8.9 kcal/mol), and tipranavir (−9.6 kcal/mol) showed stronger binding affinities than tecovirimat (−7.6 kcal/mol), while molnupiravir exhibited comparable affinity (−7.3 kcal/mol). The pharmacokinetic and toxicity profiles of fluocinolone, molnupiravir, and tipranavir were almost similar to the reference drug. Remdesivir showed minor physicochemical differences but was predicted to be safe. Conclusion: Tipranavir, remdesivir, fluocinolone, and molnupiravir emerged as promising MPXV poxin protein inhibitors, requiring further experimental validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haque et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: