In recent years, imaginative techniques have effectively addressed the growing demand for brief, evidence-based treatments applicable in various contexts. Among these, Imagery with Rescripting (ImRs) was developed within the Schema Therapy model. ImRs can be applied individually or in combination with other protocols, demonstrating significant outcomes even after just one session. This narrative review aims to provide an overview of the applications of ImRs, with a specific focus on its effectiveness in trauma-related disorders. The search string used was “(‘imagery with Rescripting’) AND ((‘Trauma’ OR ‘PTSD’ OR ‘dissociation’))”. The following databases were utilized: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Medline, Embase, and PsychInfo. The research included English-language and Italian-language studies, encompassing experimental and observational designs, case reports, and case series. Samples consisted of healthy participants or clinical populations aged 18 years and older, with no temporal limitations. A total of 56 articles were selected. The results highlight the efficacy of this intervention, whether administered individually or as part of combined protocols, across a wide range of diagnostic categories, including healthy samples, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), borderline personality disorder (BDP), sleep disorders, psychotic spectrum disorders, chronic pain, anxiety disorders, depression, and eating disorders. The studies also support hypotheses about the mechanisms underlying the technique: ImRs facilitates the reprocessing of the meaning associated with mental representations and reduces the occurrence of negative intrusive images related to past events. This process alters and rewrites the individual’s negative memories and images. The narrative review supports the effectiveness of ImRs in treating various psychopathological disorders, both trauma-related and non-trauma-related. In addition to highlighting the effectiveness of ImRs when appropriately integrated with other techniques, the review emphasizes the importance of conducting efficacy studies on larger samples to evaluate ImRs as a standalone intervention model.
Uvelli et al. (Wed,) studied this question.