Investigations reveal the effects of particle surface properties on hydrate formation and gas storage in subsea environments.
Large-scale hydrate-based carbon capture and sequestration (HBCCS) through hydrates in a subsea environment will play a pivotal role in combating global warming. The role of clay/particles in hydrate kinetics is crucial and not widely investigated, especially in the submicrometer size particle scale for HBCCS. The impact of submicrometer particles (SmPs: >1000 nm) and their surface functionalities on gas hydrate kinetics in larger liter-scale reactors have been investigated. Investigations have been carried out using sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and SiO2 particles with different surface features dispersed in seawater at ∼276 K and ∼4.5 MPa injection pressure. All silica particles demonstrate an inhibitory effect on hydrate induction time; however, the degree of the increase in induction time depends on the hydrophilicity of particles. In this study, both conventional (Vg = constant) and modified approach (Vg = variable) were compared and a nearly 5–7.6% increase in gas uptake has been observed with the modified approach incorporating volume change effect owing to hydrate volume change in comparison to the traditional approach. The CO2-philic functionalized silica particle system demonstrates ∼5.4% and 88.6% increase in gas uptake compared to seawater (SW) + SDS and SW systems; however, it has a ∼1.12 times slower initial hydrate formation rate than SW + SDS but a ∼4.6 times faster initial hydrate formation rate than the seawater system. The functionalized CO2-philic silica system with high surface area and porosity adsorbed and slowly released CO2 through micro/mesopores, yielding higher gas uptake at slower rates. Fumed silica particles achieved higher hydrate formation rates due to their moderate surface area and chain-like aggregates creating abundant heterogeneous nucleation sites, but their high hydrophilicity reduced overall gas uptake.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: