A scientometric review examines sustainability in housing policies, revealing trends and implications for urban transitions.
Purpose This study aims to examine the global research landscape regarding sustainability in housing policies through a scientometric review. It situates the identified research themes and trends within the Urban Sustainability Transitions (UST) frameworks, connecting them to wider urban sustainability transition processes. Design/methodology/approach The study uses a qualitative, scientometric analysis with quantitative insights of 203 peer-reviewed articles from the Scopus database published between 2000 and February 2025, focusing on top-cited journals, country-specific outputs and author keyword co-occurrence. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) screening workflow was used to perform VOSviewer-based author keyword co-occurrence, co-citation and temporal overlay analyses. These were then discussed through the UST frameworks for policy recommendations. Findings Eight thematic clusters emerged covering affordability, urbanization, climate risk and self-help housing, affordability within sustainable transitions, social sustainability, informal settlements, home ownership and social housing. The temporal overlay reveals that since 2015, the focus has shifted from technology/efficiency to equity and displacement risks, regime lock-ins in finance and planning and capability/implementation concerns. Global North knowledge remains heavily concentrated alongside sparse Global South-anchored practice debates. Originality/value This study provides a clear, cluster-linked policy portfolio with measurable policy metrics to connect housing, environmental and economic goals in housing policy development and monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Faboye et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: