Key result
Machine learning score links routine clinical data to ~63% higher aortic stenosis risk per decile.
Why the study?
Untreated moderate to severe aortic stenosis carries high mortality, but early identification enables treatment with transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Does a machine learning model using routine medical records accurately predict the 3-year risk of aortic stenosis in the general population?
Cohort (n=919,954)
Yes
Does a machine learning model using routine medical records accurately predict the 3-year risk of aortic stenosis in the general population?
Odds Ratio: 1.63 (95% CI 1.6–1.67)
p-value: p=<0.0001
A machine learning model leveraging routine electronic health record data can accurately predict the 3-year risk of aortic stenosis, identifying asymptomatic high-risk individuals prior to standard echocardiographic screening.
May support routine-data risk stratification in primary care; hypothesis-generating for targeted AS screening trials.
Aims All-cause mortality ranges between 33% and 42% for individuals with untreated moderate to severe aortic stenosis (AS). Transcatheter aortic valve replacement makes this a treatable condition, if identified early. Machine learning-based tools show great promise to predict cardiovascular outcomes. Methods and results We developed and validated a machine learning model for 3-year prediction of AS risk (ASrisk) using serum biomarkers and vital sign measurements. We then evaluated the tool’s capacity to identify diagnoses of AS sequelae, echocardiographic outcomes in individuals not diagnosed with AS, as well as enrichment and 3-year aortic valve area reduction in individuals with high ASrisk. Among 919 954 participants, 429 996 were from the Mount Sinai Data Warehouse (MSDW) [2179 (0.5%) AS cases] and 489 958 were from the UK Biobank [5066 (1%) AS cases]. Odds ratio (OR) of AS sequelae increased quantitatively with ascending deciles of ASrisk [OR 1.63 (95% CI 1.60–1.67) in MSDW]. Increasing ASrisk by 1 SD resulted in higher odds of echocardiographic findings in undiagnosed individuals [OR 1.88 (95% CI 1.71–2.06) for Doppler velocity index, OR 2.50 (95% CI 2.36–2.64) for aortic valve area, and OR 2.61 (95% CI 1.89–2.71) for mean gradient]. Three years after risk assessment, individuals with ASrisk > 0.95 show an 11-fold enrichment for AS diagnosis in both cohorts and an average reduction in aortic valve area of 0.42 cm2. Conclusion ASrisk can predict risk of AS 3 years ahead of diagnosis in the general population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Petrazzini et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Aortic stenosis (n=919,954). ASrisk machine learning model vs. Lower deciles/thresholds of ASrisk was evaluated on Aortic stenosis sequelae (aortic valve replacement) per ascending decile of ASrisk in MSDW (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.60-1.67, p=<0.0001). A machine learning score (ASrisk) using routine biomarkers and vital signs accurately predicted the 3-year risk of aortic stenosis sequelae (OR 1.63 per ascending decile) in a large observational cohort.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: