Experimental studies reveal gendered effects of dyadic co-streaming on purchase intentions, highlighting emotional dynamics.
Purpose This study examines an overlooked phenomenon in livestreaming commerce: compared with solo-streaming (a single streamer), dyadic co-streaming (a streamer with an opposite-sex assistant) may reduce purchase intentions among opposite-sex viewers. It further explores the psychological mechanisms and boundary conditions underlying this effect. Design/methodology/approach Four experimental studies across diverse product categories were conducted with 938 Chinese participants to test the proposed model. Findings For female viewers, dyadic co-streaming (vs. solo-streaming) weakened parasocial romantic relationships (PSRR) with male streamers and heightened romantic jealousy toward female assistants, both leading to lower purchase intentions. For male viewers, dyadic co-streaming strengthened PSRR but also increased romantic jealousy, producing offsetting indirect effects and a nonsignificant total effect. Among females, the negative effect via romantic jealousy was stronger for high appearance-enhancement products, whereas the effect via PSRR was stronger for low appearance-enhancement products. Practical implications Livestreaming marketers should account for gender dynamics and product type when adopting co-streaming formats. For female audiences, pairing male streamers with female assistants may evoke jealousy and weaken parasocial bonds, especially for high appearance-enhancement products; solo- or same-gender streaming may be preferable. For male audiences, co-streaming can enhance engagement but may also trigger jealousy, offsetting its benefits. Originality/value This research advances the understanding of livestreaming commerce by comparing dyadic and solo-streaming formats and revealing gender-specific emotional mechanisms. It integrates PSRR and romantic jealousy into a unified model, showing how interpersonal dynamics and product type jointly shape purchase intentions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: