Correction clarifies metrics and findings on non-communicable diseases from 2000-2021, indicating revisions.
A Correction on: Zhou M, Jiang Y, Zhu J, Li Z, Sun H, Gao F and Weng K (2026) Crossnational disparities in non-communicable disease: a universal health coverage-based service coverage index perspective, 2000-2021. Front. Public Health 14:1756485. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1756485 There was a mistake in Figure 1 as published. The right-hand Y-axis labels for panels (a), (b) and (d) showing "Age-standardized Incidence rate per 100,000", "Age-standardized Prevalence rate per 100,000"and "Age-standardized Mortality rate per 100,000" were erroneously denoted as "Agestandardized DALYs rate per 100,000" due to a typographical oversight. The corrected figure 1 appears below.In the section Results, sub-section Global panel fixed-effects model analysis of NCDs, the authors had requested that the phrase "Figure 2b reveals that the coefficient estimate for physicians per 10,000 population is not statistically significant (95% CI includes 0), while health expenditure as a percentage of GDP has a significant positive impact on SCI (95% CI does not include 0)." should be revised to the more conservative statement: "while health expenditure as a percentage of GDP has a positive impact on SCI." However, due to an oversight, the correction instruction itself was inadvertently inserted into the main text instead of implementing the actual revision. A correction has been made to the section Results, sub-section Global panel fixed-effects model analysis of NCDs so that the sentence now reads: "Figure 2b reveals that the coefficient estimate for physicians per 10,000 population is not statistically significant (95% CI includes 0), while health expenditure as a percentage of GDP has a positive impact on SCI."The original version of this article has been updated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frontiers Production Office (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: