PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 2026International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management0 citations

A framework for merit, diversity, equity, and inclusion

View Full Paper
JMJuan M. Madera

Key Points

  • This paper aims to address the relationship between merit and DEI, highlighting DEI's essential role in achieving true meritocracy.
  • Applies the four mechanisms of critical reflection as described by Brookfield.
  • Analyzes the distinctions between DEI and merit literatures from theoretical perspectives.
  • Examines the political influences on anti-DEI narratives in hospitality and tourism.
  • Identifies DEI and merit as stemming from distinct theoretical lenses.
  • Argues for redefining DEI as merit-enhancing rather than contradictory.
  • Highlights the necessity of DEI in managing diversity in a global sector amidst political pressures.

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to offer a Critical Reflection on the emerging anti-diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) narrative that promotes merit-based selection as an alternative to DEI. This paper proposes a theory-driven framework that reframes DEI as a prerequisite for realizing true meritocracy in selection systems. Design/methodology/approach This paper applies the four mechanisms of critical reflection as outlined by Brookfield (2009). Findings The merit-based selection and DEI literatures stem from two distinct theoretical lenses, partially providing an explanation for why DEI and merit are discussed as distinct approaches to selection systems. This paper redefines the scope of DEI by providing a new understanding of the role of DEI policies and initiatives for achieving merit. Practical implications This paper outlines the importance of reframing DEI as merit-enhancing because hospitality and tourism must manage the diversity that is inherent in a global sector while navigating anti-DEI pressures driven more by politics than by business realities. Originality/value An anti-DEI narrative has recently emerged, calling for merit to replace DEI. However, there is a gap in the DEI literature that outlines its complementary role with merit. To address this gap, this paper offers a critical analysis of the emerging erroneous DEI versus merit debate.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Juan M. Madera (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3abf602a1e69014ccd4d5https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-05-2025-0636
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Challenges of Critical Reflection: ‘Nothing Ventured, Nothing Gained’2007 · 283 citations
  2. 2Racial/Ethnic Inequities in Paid Parental Leave Access2021 · 56 citations
  3. 3Can selecting the most qualified candidate be unfair? Learning about socioeconomic advantages and disadvantages reduces the perceived fairness of meritocracy and increases support for socioeconomic diversity initiatives in organizations.2024 · 10 citations
  4. 4Tourism workforce research: A review, taxonomy and agenda2016 · 298 citations
  5. 5Migrant worker inclusion and psychological well-being: Insights from the hospitality and tourism workplace2023 · 19 citations