Theoretical analysis reveals how diversity initiatives safeguard procedural fairness in hospitality organizations, suggesting moral appeals can mitigate backlash against merit-based practices.
The recent backlash against Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) creates a strategic paradox for hospitality and tourism (H&T) firms: the sector’s demographic and cultural diversity heighten the need for DEI initiatives even as such efforts face opposition. In response we develop a framework that reframes DEI as the process safeguarding procedural fairness to ensure merit-based outcomes. We integrate identity-blind personnel scholarship (e.g. validity and KSAOs) with identity-conscious DEI research (e.g. structural bias, and intergroup dynamics) to show how DEI practices mitigate bias that undermine merit. We further propose targeted moral appeals (care, fairness, loyalty, authority, purity) mapped to specific backlash mechanisms to strengthen perceived fairness of DEI-integrated systems. By grounding a moral appeal in shared standards of procedural and outcome fairness, this framework moves beyond the DEI business case rationale and provides pathways for future research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Madera et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: