Exploratory mixed methods study shows victim input influences CoSA dynamics, suggesting key implications for program design.
Victim/survivors of sexual violence have long served as volunteers in Circles of Support and Accountability (CoSA); however, little has been documented about broader victim/survivor input into CoSA. This research addressed this gap through an online survey and in-depth qualitative interviews with CoSA staff and volunteers across the globe. It documented that in participants’ views, victim/survivors need to occupy the ‘Goldilocks’ position by evoking empathy on the part of the perpetrator, while not doing so in a way that is too punitive so as to threaten perpetrator stability. Findings of the study may be relevant to CoSA programs around the world considering expanding and/or formalizing victim/survivor input.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richards et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: