This analysis integrates intersectionality into identity theory, revealing insights into identity formation in diverse families, suggesting new theoretical directions.
Identity theory (IT) has a rich history in family science research; however, neither IT itself nor research using identity theory have focused on diversity or systems of inequality. We suggest that the propositions and assumptions of identity theory are highly compatible with more current critical theories, such as intersectionality. In the current paper, we integrate components from intersectionality theory into identity theory to develop a Critical Identity Theory (CIT). We introduce the importance of belonging, two forms of identities (role identities and sociocultural identities), and four levels within which identities are negotiated (sociocultural, institutional, relational, and individual). The remainder of the theory's propositions and assumptions are organized around the processes involved in the creation and negotiation of identities and identity enactment. Implications of the theory for future research, theorizing, policy, and practice are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adamsons et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: