Mixed methods study uncovers ethical dilemmas in archaeological practices, influencing public perceptions in Egypt.
The study explores ethical considerations in archaeological excavations and repatriation practices within Egypt's cultural heritage sector. A mixed methods approach combining qualitative interviews with stakeholders (archaeologists, curators) and quantitative surveys among museum visitors to assess public perceptions and attitudes towards these practices. Findings indicate that a significant proportion—35% of survey respondents—expressed concerns about the authenticity of repatriated artifacts, indicating a need for clearer communication strategies by museums. The mixed methods study reveals nuanced ethical dilemmas in archaeological excavations and repatriation, with public understanding largely influenced by museum narratives and presentation of artifacts. Recommendations include enhanced transparency in the handling and authentication of repatriated items to foster better community engagement and trust.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
El-Sayed et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: