We only have this paper's title and publication details.
Read it at the sourceQuasi-experimental study compares canine retraction rates using two different methods in dental applications, suggesting one may be more effective.
At all the follow-ups, the canine retraction was higher using NiTi springs than elastomeric chains.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ehsan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: