Double-blind study demonstrates effective quantification of lipid nanoparticle concentration using derived count rate.
The rapid advancement of nanomedicine, particularly underscored by the clinical success of lipid nanoparticle (LNP)-based vaccines, has intensified the need for simple, accurate, and widely accessible analytical techniques. A critical yet often overlooked parameter in nanoparticle development is the precise determination of the nanoparticle concentration. Conventional methods such as nanoparticle tracking analysis and electron microscopy are costly, low-throughput, and unavailable in most laboratories, creating a significant bottleneck in nanomedicine research and quality control. We investigated the potential of derived count rate (DCR), a scattered intensity parameter inherent to dynamic light scattering (DLS) when using a Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern Panalytical Ltd.)─an instrument available in virtually all nanomedicine laboratories─as a quantitative tool for LNP concentration analysis. A comprehensive DCR-concentration-size map was established using model LNP batches with varying concentrations. This data was used to derive a model correlating DCR, LNP size, and concentration. The model's predictive power was rigorously validated through a double-blind study involving independently formulated LNP batches with randomized compositions and unknown concentrations, done by formulators of varying expertise. The predictive model demonstrated an excellent fit. In the double-blind validation, the model predicted LNP concentrations with an error of only ∼4% compared to the theoretical values. Crucially, the method proved robust and user-independent, showing consistent high precision and accuracy across beginner, junior, and senior formulators. This study establishes DCR from standard DLS measurements as a simple, accurate, and highly accessible method for LNP quantification, bypassing the need for specialized equipment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nandrajog et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: