This methodological appraisal develops a forecasting model evaluating cost-effectiveness in district hospitals, indicating its strategic utility.
District hospitals are critical nodes in Kenya's healthcare system, yet persistent challenges in resource allocation and financial sustainability necessitate robust tools for evaluating their cost-effectiveness. Existing evaluations often lack longitudinal, predictive capacity. This study aimed to develop and methodologically appraise a novel time-series forecasting model designed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of district hospital systems, providing a tool for forward-looking resource planning. We constructed a state-space model integrating historical administrative data on hospital expenditures and outcome proxies (e.g., bed-day equivalents). The core forecasting equation is yₜ = Zₜ αₜ + εₜ, where αₜ = Tₜ αₜ₋₁ + Rₜ ηₜ. Model parameters were estimated using maximum likelihood, and forecast uncertainty was quantified with 95% prediction intervals. The methodological appraisal demonstrated that the model produced stable long-term forecasts, with prediction interval coverage exceeding 93% in back-testing. A key finding was a forecasted progressive divergence between input costs and outcome gains, suggesting diminishing marginal returns on incremental expenditure under current configurations. The proposed model provides a statistically robust methodological framework for projecting cost-effectiveness trends in hospital systems, highlighting its utility for strategic planning. Health policymakers should adopt similar forecasting tools for medium-term budgetary planning. Further research should integrate more granular clinical outcome data into the model's structure. health economics, forecasting, state-space models, health systems, resource allocation This paper introduces a novel application of state-space modelling for health system cost-effectiveness forecasting, providing a methodological advance for longitudinal health policy analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mwangi et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: