Key result
ICD implantation effectively terminates recurrent arrhythmias in coronary artery spasm patients surviving sudden cardiac arrest.
Why the study?
Coronary artery spasm can trigger sudden cardiac arrest, and the role of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in these patients remains controversial.
Does implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation prevent sudden cardiac death in patients with coronary artery spasm and prior VT/VF or cardiac arrest?
Does implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation prevent sudden cardiac death in patients with coronary artery spasm and prior VT/VF or cardiac arrest?
ICD implantation effectively terminates life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in patients with coronary artery spasm who have survived sudden cardiac arrest or documented VT/VF.
Supports ICD after spasm-related arrest or VT/VF; extends limited evidence but leaves open need for prospective validation.
Coronary artery spasm (CAS) can trigger severe angina pectoris, acute coronary syndrome, or sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). Calcium channel blockers and nitrates are recommended treatments, but the role of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) remains controversial. This study explored ICD application in CAS via a case series of cardiac arrest survivors and a patient with typical angiography findings. Four patients with recurrent angina (3 with prior cardiac arrest) were diagnosed with suspected or definite CAS based on predefined criteria and coronary angiography findings: transient ST-segment elevation, nitrate-responsive coronary narrowing, and no identifiable reversible triggers. Three patients with documented ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) or SCA underwent ICD implantation, while the one without such history did not. During 3.6 ± 1.3 years of follow-up, all experienced recurrent angina (reduced by maximum-tolerated calcium antagonists plus long-acting nitrates). VT/VF events in two ICD recipients were successfully terminated by anti-tachycardia pacing or shocks. This case series confirms recurrent angina is common in CAS and highlights the efficacy of calcium antagonists and nitrates. ICD implantation may be warranted for CAS patients who survive VT/VF, a strategy supported by the literature. • Coronary artery spasm (CAS) can manifest not only as typical rest-related variant angina but also as exercise-induced episodes, and it may progress to life-threatening events such as ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), or sudden cardiac death (SCA), even in the absence of severe fixed coronary stenosis. • Long-term administration of non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers combined with long-acting nitrates at maximum tolerated doses is effective in reducing the recurrence of angina pectoris in CAS patients. • For CAS patients who have survived sudden cardiac arrest or documented VT/VF, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation should be considered, as it can appropriately terminate recurrent life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias through anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) or shocks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2026) studied this question. ICD implantation is warranted for coronary artery spasm patients who survive sudden cardiac arrest or documented VT/VF, as it effectively terminates recurrent arrhythmias.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: