This review compares fabrication strategies for 3D electrospun structures, highlighting scalability issues in various methods.
Electrospinning has evolved from producing two-dimensional nanofiber mats to forming three-dimensional electrospun (3D ES) structures with improved mechanical integrity and functional performance. However, scalable and controllable fabrication of 3D ES structures remains challenging. This review provides a quantitative and mechanism-oriented comparison of major fabrication strategies, including single-nozzle electrospinning (SN), electric field manipulation (EFM), mold-based methods (MBM), near-field electrospinning (NF), hybrid electrospinning–3D printing methods (HBM), controlled deposition systems (CDM), and multi-nozzle electrospinning (MN). Reported operating parameters span applied voltages from 0.1 to 65 kV, working distances from 0.1 to 385 mm, and material delivery rates from 0.006 to 96 mL/h. SN-based and mold-assisted approaches demonstrate the feasibility of forming 3D ES structures under single-jet conditions and low flow rates (typically < 7 mL/h), but their scalability is inherently limited. NF achieves high positional accuracy at short working distances (≤ 80 mm) and low voltages (≤ 8 kV), though its narrow process window restricts large-area fabrication. In contrast, MN electrospinning enables the highest throughput, with nozzle counts ranging from 2 to 72 and fiber diameters as small as 66 nm. Importantly, successful 3D structure formation using single-nozzle configurations confirms that the fundamental electrohydrodynamic mechanisms for three-dimensional growth already exist, implying that MN systems operating at higher throughput possess greater potential for scalable 3D ES fabrication. Despite this, MN performance remains highly sensitive to inter-nozzle spacing, electric-field uniformity, and jet–jet electrostatic interactions, which continue to limit deposition uniformity and mechanical robustness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muthusamy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: