PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 2026Journal of Chemical Education0 citations

Evaluation of a Three-Semester General and Organic Chemistry Course Sequence: A Five-Year Side-by-Side Analysis of a Curricular Change

View Full Paper
LKLeslie D. KnechtCGCésar Otero González

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of a three-semester chemistry course sequence compared to the traditional approach.
  • Analyzed student performance over five years across both traditional and modified curricula.
  • Monitored DFW (Drop, Fail, Withdraw) rates for student preparedness assessment.
  • Compared biochemistry performance between students from both curricula.
  • No significant differences in student preparedness or DFW rates between the two sequences.
  • Students in the modified curriculum displayed improved performance in biochemistry.

Abstract

More than a decade ago, the University of Miami began to transition to a three-semester general and organic chemistry course sequence. This type of curricular reform has been implemented at other institutions, but few studies track curriculum changes by offering the traditional and modified curriculum in the same semesters. Herein, we describe the evolution of the curricular changes from the traditional general and organic chemistry sequence to a three-semester sequence at the University of Miami. From our analysis, we found no difference in the student preparedness or DFW rates between the two curriculums. We also found that students who completed the modified curriculum performed better in biochemistry. This study demonstrates that chemistry can be taught in three semesters without adverse effects on student outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Knecht et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3acd302a1e69014ccee26https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c01431
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper