This investigation evaluates AI-driven detection of railway defects, demonstrating effective implementation for safety improvement.
Railway infrastructure demands continuous monitoring to ensure operational safety and prevent catastrophic failures. Conventional inspection approaches, including manual visual examination and non-destructive testing, exhibit constraints in scalability, processing speed, and automation capability. This investigation presents a rigorous evaluation of three advanced deep learning frameworks—YOLOv11, YOLO-NAS, and Roboflow 3.0 (Robolow’s default model) on roboflow platform—for detecting multiple rail defect categories, with particular attention to addressing class imbalance challenges. A real-world dataset containing 7,587 images with 35,549 annotations spanning ten defect categories was assembled from North Western Railways, India. The research implements targeted augmentation methodologies and class-weighted training protocols to address severe imbalance (ranging from 0.4% for Broken-Rail to 17.6% for Shelling). Performance assessment across accuracy metrics, computational efficiency, and deployment viability demonstrates YOLOv11 achieving superior mean Average Precision (89.8%), while YOLO-NAS exhibits competitive speed-accuracy trade-offs. Critical examination of cross-regional generalization, temporal robustness, and real-time deployment constraints delivers practical insights for railway authorities implementing AI-based inspection frameworks. • Introduces a tiered augmentation framework that reduces dataset imbalance by 88.6% (from 45.3:1 to 5.15:1). • Evaluates three state-of-the-art models—YOLOv11, YOLO-NAS, and Roboflow 3.0 on Roboflow platform—on 10 railway defect classes. • YOLOv11 achieved the highest mAP (89.8%), while YOLO-NAS offered the best real-time inference speed (34.8 FPS). • Demonstrates robust detection of rare defects (Broken-Rail, Joints, Missing-Fasteners) with ≥95% AP. • Provides a deployment feasibility and ROI analysis for railway inspection systems. • Establishes a reproducible benchmark for AI-based defect detection in safety-critical infrastructure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mordia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: